University Global Innovation Readiness

Section A

Institutional Profile

Tell us about your institution so we can tailor the assessment to your context.

1. Institution Name *

2. Contact Person Name *

3. Designation *

4. Email *

5. Mobile Number *

6. City *

7. State *

8. Country *

9. Pincode *

10. Type of Institution *

11. Number of Students *

12. Existing Incubation Center? *

Yes No

13. Number of Startups Supported

14. International Collaborations Existing? *

Yes No

15. Entrepreneurship Programs Conducted? *

Yes No

Section B · UNI_D01 · Weight 14

Strategy & governance

How clear is your plan for setting a clear international goal, approval process and accountable leadership?

Q1How clear is your plan for setting a clear international goal, approval process and accountable leadership?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: approved strategy, governing-body decision, KPIs and governance charter

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show institutional approval and governance?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: approved strategy, governing-body decision, KPIs and governance charter

Q3How ready are you to manage setting a clear international goal, approval process and accountable leadership?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: approved strategy, governing-body decision, KPIs and governance charter

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to implement the international initiative with clear decisions?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: approved strategy, governing-body decision, KPIs and governance charter

Section C · UNI_D02 · Weight 15

Academic quality & accreditation

How clear is your plan for meeting academic-quality, recognition and accreditation requirements?

Q1How clear is your plan for meeting academic-quality, recognition and accreditation requirements?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: accreditation status, quality framework, curriculum mapping and regulator engagement

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show quality assurance and accreditation readiness?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: accreditation status, quality framework, curriculum mapping and regulator engagement

Q3How ready are you to manage meeting academic-quality, recognition and accreditation requirements?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: accreditation status, quality framework, curriculum mapping and regulator engagement

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to deliver recognised, high-quality academic outcomes?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: accreditation status, quality framework, curriculum mapping and regulator engagement

Section D · UNI_D03 · Weight 12

International Portfolio Fit

How clear is your plan for choosing countries, programmes and partners that fit the institution’s strengths?

Q1How clear is your plan for choosing countries, programmes and partners that fit the institution’s strengths?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: portfolio analysis, demand study, student data and academic business case

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show the fit of the proposed international portfolio?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: portfolio analysis, demand study, student data and academic business case

Q3How ready are you to manage choosing countries, programmes and partners that fit the institution’s strengths?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: portfolio analysis, demand study, student data and academic business case

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to build a relevant and sustainable international offering?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: portfolio analysis, demand study, student data and academic business case

Section E · UNI_D04 · Weight 13

Financial & business model

How clear is your plan for funding the initiative through a realistic and sustainable model?

Q1How clear is your plan for funding the initiative through a realistic and sustainable model?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: multi-year model, downside case, funding approval and break-even analysis

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show the budget, downside case and business model?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: multi-year model, downside case, funding approval and break-even analysis

Q3How ready are you to manage funding the initiative through a realistic and sustainable model?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: multi-year model, downside case, funding approval and break-even analysis

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to sustain the initiative without weakening existing obligations?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: multi-year model, downside case, funding approval and break-even analysis

Section F · UNI_D05 · Weight 12

Partnership Capability

How clear is your plan for selecting and managing credible international partners?

Q1How clear is your plan for selecting and managing credible international partners?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: partner criteria, due diligence, references, agreements and performance reviews

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show partner due diligence and relationship capability?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: partner criteria, due diligence, references, agreements and performance reviews

Q3How ready are you to manage selecting and managing credible international partners?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: partner criteria, due diligence, references, agreements and performance reviews

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to build active partnerships that deliver agreed outcomes?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: partner criteria, due diligence, references, agreements and performance reviews

Section G · UNI_D06 · Weight 12

Recruitment & student support

How clear is your plan for recruiting, onboarding and supporting international students?

Q1How clear is your plan for recruiting, onboarding and supporting international students?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: agent controls, funnel data, admissions process, orientation and support capacity

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show the student recruitment and support system?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: agent controls, funnel data, admissions process, orientation and support capacity

Q3How ready are you to manage recruiting, onboarding and supporting international students?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: agent controls, funnel data, admissions process, orientation and support capacity

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to attract and support students responsibly?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: agent controls, funnel data, admissions process, orientation and support capacity

Section H · UNI_D07 · Weight 12

Legal, risk & data readiness

How clear is your plan for meeting legal, data, safeguarding and risk requirements?

Q1How clear is your plan for meeting legal, data, safeguarding and risk requirements?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: legal register, risk assessment, privacy review, policies and professional opinions

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show legal and risk controls?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: legal register, risk assessment, privacy review, policies and professional opinions

Q3How ready are you to manage meeting legal, data, safeguarding and risk requirements?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: legal register, risk assessment, privacy review, policies and professional opinions

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to operate responsibly without material legal or student-protection failures?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: legal register, risk assessment, privacy review, policies and professional opinions

Section I · UNI_D08 · Weight 10

Operations, faculty & digital

How clear is your plan for providing the faculty, systems, digital delivery and operational support required?

Q1How clear is your plan for providing the faculty, systems, digital delivery and operational support required?

I have not started planning this I have a general idea only I have started planning, but important details are missing I have a clear written plan with responsibilities and dates The plan is complete, reviewed and ready to use

Evidence requested: faculty plan, delivery model, systems integration, service levels and continuity plan

Q2What evidence do you currently have to show operational, faculty and digital readiness?

I do not have evidence yet I only have my own view or informal feedback I have some documents or information, but there are important gaps I have strong and current supporting evidence My evidence is current, verified and supported by more than one reliable source

Evidence requested: faculty plan, delivery model, systems integration, service levels and continuity plan

Q3How ready are you to manage providing the faculty, systems, digital delivery and operational support required?

I am not ready to do this I could do this only with significant help I am partly prepared, but resources or steps are missing I am prepared and can do this consistently I have already shown that I can do this well, including when conditions are difficult

Evidence requested: faculty plan, delivery model, systems integration, service levels and continuity plan

Q4What progress have you already made towards the ability to deliver the international programme consistently?

I have not made measurable progress yet I have started, but there is no clear result yet I have achieved one useful result, with some gaps remaining I have achieved several relevant results I have repeatedly achieved the intended result

Evidence requested: faculty plan, delivery model, systems integration, service levels and continuity plan

Final Check · Mandatory Requirements

Critical Readiness Checks

These four questions are evaluated separately from your dimension scores. A failed Critical Readiness Check or unresolved unknown means you cannot be shown as fully “Ready” even if your overall score is high — the report will instead point you to the specific verification needed.

G1Institutional authority: Has the authorised institutional body approved exploration of this international initiative?

Yes No Not sure / need to check

G2Accreditation feasibility: Is there a possible recognition or accreditation route for the proposed programme and delivery model?

Yes No Not sure / need to check

G3Financial downside: Can the institution fund the initiative even if income is lower or delayed?

Yes No Not sure / need to check

G4Student protection: Can the institution provide student protection, safeguarding, data controls and support throughout the programme?

Yes No Not sure / need to check

University Global Readiness Assessment

Institutional Profile

Strategy & governance

Academic quality & accreditation

International Portfolio Fit

Financial & business model

Partnership Capability

Recruitment & student support

Legal, risk & data readiness

Operations, faculty & digital

Critical Readiness Checks